The Campus Environmental Audit: Water, Wastewater and Storm Runoff
Introduction
Agricultural, industrial, recreational, and human and animal life forms
are dependent on the use of fresh water. Based on our daily water consumption,
one might think that the amount of water available to us is infinite. Yet
only about 3% of the earth's water is freshwater and over 66% of our fresh
waters is in the form of glaciers.(1) In order to
maintain a plentiful water supply, we must take measures to reduce our
water usage. Conserving not only saves water, but it also saves energy
and chemicals which are needed for treatment and purification.
Back to the top of the page
Water
Management at the University of Pennsylvania
Water usage is managed by the University of Pennsylvania's Department of
Physical Plant. The three primary objectives of the department's water
management are:
The department has two primary managers, one who focuses on water usage
within campus facilities and the other that is responsible for campus grounds.
The Philadelphia Water Department manages the water and wastewater treatment
processes and the delivery and removal of water to campus.
Back to the top of the page
Relevant Environmental Concepts
The polluting of our waterways affects many sources of water including
oceans, surface waters and deep-lying aquifers that hold ground water.
The pollution, caused by point and non point sources, produces health risks
to humans, plants and animals. Contaminants can however, be reduced, treated
and removed through water treatment and wastewater treatment processes.
Point source pollutants are derived from a wide variety of direct discharges.
Under the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency has authority
to set water quality standards and industry by industry effluent standards
for all contaminants. The law makes point source discharges into navigable
waters illegal unless a permit is obtained through the EPA or a state agency
with delegated authority.(2)
Non point source pollution describes indirect pollutants that move through
the air, across the land, through the soil and into surface and ground
waters. Four major sources of non point sources are air pollution that
leads to acid rain, agricultural activities in the form of sediment, pesticides
and other nutrient pollutants, and construction activities that affect
land development, waste disposal, and resource extraction. In urban areas,
like Philadelphia, non point pollution is also caused by pollutants like
oil and chemicals that enter the water systems during rain storms. Non
point pollutants cloud the water, reduce oxygen supply, and disrupt stream
habitat. It is estimated that non point sources have caused 65% of stream
pollution, 76% of lake pollution and 45% of estuary pollution.(3)
In order for humans to use and consume water, water needs to be tested
in water treatment facilities. The principal reasons for treatment are
to reduce particulate matter, lower health risks with associated microbiological
contaminants and improve color and taste characteristics.(4)
Typical water treatment processes include disinfection, filtration, flocculation,
and sedimentation.
Disinfection protects against infectious disease by reducing the number
of pathogens in the water. However, disinfection can also introduces a
small potential health risk due to the addition of chlorine.(5)
Filtration, flocculation, and sedimentation remove harmful water contaminants
such as suspended sediments, microorganisms, and inorganic. The chemicals
used in these processes are typically of low toxicity and used at low concentrations.
Inorganics added in water treatnent do not appear to pose a threat to public
health either.(6)
Treated water is then used for a wide variety residential of uses that
can be seen by figure 13. Water is also used in many commercial and industrial
applications, and from the literature it is difficult to estimate the amount
of water used in each application.
Source: Philadelphia Water Department, ÒBelmont Water
Treatment Plant,Ó No Date of Publication, p. 2.
Finally, water is treated by wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater
treatment aims to remove effluent to EPA standards that meet biochemical
oxygen demand, suspended solids, fecal coliform and pH requirements. Nutrients,
like phosphorous and nitrogen, can also be removed in order prevent eutrophrication.(7)
Back to the top of the page
The Audit
Water Usage
Wastewater and Storm Runoff
Back to the top of the page
The Results
Water Usage
Penn consumes water from the Schulkykill river. This water is treated at
the Belmont Water Treatment Plant in Northwest Philadelphia. The plant
uses an eight step process to distribute water including: natural sedimentation,
pre-chlorination, chemical treatment, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration,
postchemical treatment and distribution. Alum, lime, chorine, zinc phosphate,
ammonia, and fluoride are used in the water treatment processes.
The University consumed approximately 1 billion ft3 of water in 1995.
The water which is used for a wide variety of uses including residential,
research, and landscaping, annually costs $2 per 1000 ft3 or 2 million
dollars. The University is billed separately for each building. Usage per
square foot and per capita is respectively and 21,512 ft3 water per capita.
Overall the usage has stayed constant due to the fact that the campus population
of 25,977 student and faculty has not changed dramatically over the past
five years.(8) Water usage is expected to rise on
campus when the new research facilities, including the Roy Valegelos Institute
for Advanced Science and Technology, come on line.
Overall water usage in outdoor facilities has never been monitored.
Penn uses an automated sprinkler system to water the most visible grounds
of campus. The system is managed by timers which are preprogrammed. Occasionally
the system is activated if the Grounds Manger, Bill Gross, determines that
the soil needs excess water or is deactivated when it recently rained.
Sometimes it is however difficult to react in time to deactivate the system
if a rainstorm has occurred. Mr. Gross estimates outside usage to be approximately
8 million gallons per year.
Penn has no comprehensive policy or approach to water conservation.
When Physical Plant renovates and constructs new buildings they install
low flow showerheads and low flow faucets. Automatic faucets are installed
in high occupancy restrooms. Penn has also taken efforts to recirculate
water. The new mod-6 chiller system reuses approximately 1.5 million gallons
of water.
Wastewater and Storm Runoff
The amount of wastewater generated by Penn is assumed to equal the amount
of water consumed minus the amount water reused or 9,997,994,500 . The
campus wastewater is treated at the Southwest Water Pollution Control Plant.
The Univeristy's wastewater product represents .315% of the plant's 178
million gallons of average daily treatment.
The plant uses a three step treatment process including preliminary,
primary and secondary treatment. Preliminary treatment remove debris by
virtue of bar screens and grit chambers. Second, primary treatment removes
45 - 50% of suspended solids by flocculation and primary sedimentation.
Finally, secondary treatment uses biological processes to remove contaminants
in an aeration and final sedimentation tank. Before discharged into the
Delaware River, disinfection is used to remove pathogens from the water.
Penn has no added costs for treating campus wastewaters. The charge for
sewer is incorporated into the price of water usage. The University has
no programs to reduce wastewater volume. The Office of Environmental Health
and Safety monitors laboratories that might discharge hazardous chemicals
into the water discharge. On campus there are two primary sources of storm
water runoff. The athletic fields are treated with a ÒminimalÓ
amount of a sulfur coated urea pesticide. The pesticide naturally bonds
to the soil however to minimize effects of runoff. In addition, salt is
used to remove ice from campus during winter storms. The University is
aggressively uses salt to prevent potential lawsuits. The University Grounds
Manager believes that Penn may use too much salt on occasions. It is unknown
how much salt usage has changed over the years.
Back to the top of the page
Water Management at
Other Universities
California State University - Northridge
Cal State Northridge has had an active water conservation program since
1986. The University has taken steps which has resulted in a 24% reduction
in water usage. The water conserve measures already instituted include
retrofitting all showers, flush vales and faucets with water saving devices,
reducing and changing irrigation systems, placing water conservation stickers
in all restrooms and kitchenettes, eliminating washing of university vehicles,
and distributing educational materials. The University is now exploring
using reclaimed water for landscaping efforts and replacing of obsolete
and malfunctioning irrigation systems .(9)
Brown University
Brown University began water conservation efforts in 1991 by retrofitting
all dormitory shower heads with low flow utilities. The program saves 5.6
million gallons of water per year and a student survey has shown consumer
satisfaction is high. In the spring of 1993, the University retrofited
all athletic facility buildings with water conserving show and faucet heads.
The university is in the process of install 1.5 gpm toilets and flush valves
in the dormitories. In addition, Brown has undertaken efforts to improve
process cooling systems for laboratory equipemtn that signifigantly reduce
water consumption. Finally, a campus water audit has been undertaken that
revealed by continuing the types of conservation measures, Brown could
save approximately 120 million gallons of water annually after all measures
are completed. This would result in a savings of approximately $300,000
per year. (10)
Back to the top of the page
Recommendations and Conclusions
Structural
Physical Plant has a good infrastructure to approach water usage and conservation.
Greening
Penn has no formal program or approach to water conservation. Designing
such a program will focus on the two categories of water use efficiency:
Elements of such programs would include:
Back to the top of the page
Back to the Penn Environmental
Group Homepage
1 The Earth Works Group, 50 Simple Things You Can do Save
the Earth, Earthworks Press, Berkley, CA, 1989, p. 50. 2 Roger Findley
and Daniel Farber, Environmental Law, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota,
1995, p. 273. 3 The Earth Works Group, 50 Simple Things You Can do Save
the Earth, Earthworks Press, Berkley, CA, 1989, p. 50. 4 Drinking Water
Health Effects Task Force, Health Effects of Drinking Water Technologies,
Lewis Publishers, Washington, DC, p. 27. 5 Drinking Water Health Effects
Task Force, Health Effects of Drinking Water Technologies, Lewis Publishers,
Washington, DC, p. 41. 6 Drinking Water Health Effects Task Force, Health
Effects of Drinking Water Technologies, Lewis Publishers, Washington, DC,
p., 81. 7 Warren Visser and Mark Hammer, Water Supply and Pollution Control,
HaperCollins College, New York, p. 302. 8University of Pennsylvania Admissions
Offices. 9 April Smith, Campus Ecology, Living Planet Press, Venice California,
1990, pg. , 60. 10 Brown is Green, Introduction to Brown is Green, http://www.envstudies.brown.edu/environ/BIG/
BrnIsGrn.html#Water 11EPA, How to Conserve Water and Use It Effectively,
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/sec6/chap3.html. 12EPA, How to Conserve Water and
Use It Effectively, http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/sec6/chap3.html.