The Campus Environmental Audit: Energy
  • Introduction
  • Energy Management at the University of Pennsylvania
  • Relevant Environmental Concepts
  • The Audit
  • The Results
  • Energy Management at Other Universities
  • Recommendations and Conclusions
  • Introduction

    Energy is the cornerstone of the University's operations. It allows the lights to go on, powers the motors in laboratories, fuels the computers, and heats the facilities of the University of Pennsylvania. However, just as energy allows classes to run, it also represents an opportunity to conserve. Energy production affects land, air and water. Energy conservation is a means to reduce impacts, improve efficiency and lower costs.

    Back to the top of the page


    Energy Management at the University of Pennsylvania

    Organizational Mission and Structure

    Energy management at the University of Pennsylvania is organized through the University of Pennsylvania Physical Plant. Located on the second floor of Franklin Annex, the department has three primary objectives:
  • provide an infrastructure to meet the University's energy demand
  • maintain and service all energy technologies
  • to assess the efficiency, quality and cost effectiveness of Penn's energy systems
  • The department employs managers, engineers, electricians and service workers to fulfill these responsibilities.

    Energy Agreements

    The University has a negotiated agreement for a rate per kilowatt hour(60,000 watts) of energy consumed. The overall energy usage is then computed by the multiplication of this rate by the peak demand per month. The peak demand is based on maximum consumption during four days of a billing cycle.

    Back to the top of the page


    Relevant Environmental Concepts

    Electricity generation is a source of air pollution, accounting for 35 percent of all U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide, 75 percent of sulfur dioxide, and 38 percent of nitrogen oxides.(1) : The effects of energy occur at all stages of the fuel cycle: production, refining/processing, transformation and conversion, transportation and distribution and consumer usage/disposal. The impact is dependent on the source of energy and its respective usage.

    The primary impacts and risks of fuel types at each stage of the fuel cycle can be seen in Table 7(See Appendix). Representative rates of air pollutants from typical new power plants configurations is seen in Table 8(See Appendix). Most fuel types seen in these tables are referred to as nonrenewable or non replenishing. Once a resource, like oil, is fully extracted it is non-replenish able. Energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar, operate on renewable energy flows.

    In order to conserve energy and reduce the environmental impacts, demand side management and education can be utilized. These range from retrofitting lights to encouraging employee conservation to maintaining pipes for leaks to using energy saving computers. Each approach aims to reduce the kWh consumption and levels of peak demand. According to the Environmental Protection Agency:
     
     

  • 3450 kWh/yr. = 1 acre of trees planted(C02)
  • 7060 kWh/yr. = 1 car removed from the road(C02)
  • 11 kWh = 1 gallon of gasoline saved(energy)(2)
  • Back to the top of the page


    The Audit

    To define the effects of the University of Pennsylvania's energy usage on the environment, the Green University audit detailed the following questions: 1. What are the sources of energy for the electric utility serving your school?

    2. How much energy did campus buildings and grounds consume in the last academic year and what were the costs associated with each type of fuel?

    3. How has campus energy use changed over the past five years?

    4. Does UPenn have an energy-efficiency program?

    5. If so, what kinds of programs does it include?

    Back to the top of the page


    The Results

    Energy Sources

    Philadelphia Electric Company(PECO), Penn's electricity supplier, utilizes fuel sources seen by Figure 10. The emissions per year of these fuel sources, assuming consumption based upon PECO percentages, are(3) :
  • 4.38 tons of SO2 per MW- year
  • 0.5 tons of PM per MW- year
  • 2.08 tons of NOx per MW- year
  • 2175.25 tons of C02 per MW - year

  •  

     

    Trigen, Penn's steam supplier, utilizes an oil based steam generation facility and is presently constructing a cogeneration facility.

    Energy Usage

    Average yearly electricity consumption and monthly peak demand is respectively 330 million kWh per year and 58,500 kWh per month. Energy is transported at 32 mV and converted to 480 and 120 volts. Current energy rates are $0.069/kWh.

    Resulting yearly emissions are(4):

  • 957 tons of SO2 per year
  • 412.5 tons of NOx per year
  • 247,500 tons of C02 per year
  • Energy Conservation(5)

    :

    Penn's approach to energy conservation can be described by a macro and micro level demand side management approach. The overall goal is to reduce energy usage in areas that will yield the highest return on investment.

    In reference to steam, the University has an aggressive manhole insulation program focusing all on piping and ball joints. Motors are regularly checked for proper operation. Traps of steam are rare and attended to promptly. The University tracks its usage by installing meters separate from Trigen in order to verify consumption and identify leakage.

    To control temperature the University has recently installed a Mod 6 chillier system that makes ice on off peak hours. This lowers peak consumption levels and minimizes energy costs. Furthermore, the centralized system has automatic pressure controls to monitor distribution. This system has saved the University over 1 million dollars and does not need to be serviced as frequently as a decentralized cooling system.

    In order to supply cooling to maintain a constant research laboratory temperature, the University has a ÒfreeÓ cooling system. This utilizes the cold weather in the winter to cool condensate in a cooling tower. Condensate is then circulated by pumps for distribution. This system prevents the need for chillers in all research labs that are typically inefficient.

    In reference to lighting, the university utilizes energy efficient technologies to control energy consumption. Retrofits have occurred in buildings including Moore, Levy, and Stielter. All renovations incorporate the usage of energy saving bulbs and ballasts. The University has surveyed all buildings and has estimates to install energy efficient lighting on campus at an estimated cost of 1.5 million dollars for 5 years. Return on investment is expected to occur in the third years.

    Overall energy usage has increased at 5% over recent years due to the increasing usage of computers by University employees, faculty and students. Consumption is expected to increase due to the reliance on technology at a higher rate than efficiency improvements.

    Back to the top of the page

    Energy Management at Other Universities

    SUNY Buffalo

    SUNY Buffalo has taken an aggressive approach to conservation with 300 projects that have reduced energy bills from 22.5 million to 20 million dollars per year. Savings are expected to increase by another 2 million dollars in coming years. The projects were funded 25% by utility rebates and incentive programs. The energy officer, Walter Simpson, focuses on long term and short term projects. He believes it is important to concentrate upon long term projects because short term projects with quick paybacks run out quickly. A balance is the most holistic way to approach energy conservation. In addition, SUNY Buffalo is also approaching conservation by energy reduction and education. The University has found that they could reduce the corridor lights by 50% and still provide sufficient illumination. Many lights were identified through the Òbuilding conservation contactsÓ who volunteer to turn off unused lights and computers, report overheated and undercooled areas, and areas where wattage could be reduced. A final tactic used is that Simpson posts energy bills in building lobbies.

    Rochester Institute of Technology

    Rochester began their conservation efforts by determining that 30% of energy is used on campus for lighting, 40% for heating, air conditioning and ventilation, 10-15% for processing equipment such as printing presses and teaching aids, and 15-20% for office equipment, computers, and other appliances. The University has employed conservation strategies including occupancy sensors, fluorescent lights, electronic ballasts, insulated heating, ventilating, and air conditioning policies, and encourage conservation minded computer and office equipment habits.

    Back to the top of the page


    Recommendations and Conclusions

    Structural

    Physical Plant has an in-depth energy management strategy. I could not foresee any structural changes necessary.

    Greening

    There are a myriad of programs and initiatives that aim to reduce energy consumption through technology and education. Table 9 shows seven different categories of energy systems and a checklist of conservation techniques. From observations:

    1. Problem: Many old buildings on campus have large building envelopes and therefore loose heat and need extra cooling.

     Solution: Utilize storm windows and floors, window treatments, improved insulation, and door seals.

    2. Opportunity: Penn is considering retrofitting its lighting systems.

     Solution 1: Joining EPAs Green Lights Program, a voluntary energy efficiency program, allows participants access to ProjectKalc, technical information, and training. ProjectKalc is a tool that calculates energy and maintenance savings from user lighting initiatives. Technical Reports focus on lighting fundamentals (http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/fundamentals.html), lighting upgrade technologies (http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/upgrade.html), lighting maintenance (http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/maintain.html), lighting evaluations (http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/evaluate.html), and lighting surveys(http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/survey.html). EPA also holds 2 1/2 day lighting upgrade workshops across the country for free. Commitments to the program include a signed agreement to evaluate all lighting opportunities and install efficient solutions where it is profitable and upholds lighting quality.

     Solution 2: Independent performance test abstracts by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute are available on line.

    Electronic Ballasts: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/Ballasts.html

     Specular Reflectors: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/Specular.html

     Occupancy Sensors: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/Sensors.html

     Compact Fluorescent Lamps: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/CFLs.html

     Exit Signs: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/EXITs.html

     Energy Efficient Reflectors: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/RefLamp.html

     General Information: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/lrc/Catalog.html#NLPIP
     
     

    3. Opportunity: Penn's energy consumers(students, faculty and staff) can become partners in energy efficiency.

     Solution 1: Building conservation contacts should be utilized to turn off unused lights and computers, report overheated and undercooled areas, and areas where wattage could be reduced.

    Solution 2: Lighting bills should be distributed to relevant departments and/or posted in buildings. A semester long competition should be held to reduce energy consumption with the winner receiving a special prize.

    Back to the top of the page
    Back to the Penn Environmental Group Homepage


    1US EPA. Energy Star Homepage. Http://www.epa.gov/~enrgy_star.html 2 US EPA. Energy Star Homepage. Http://www.epa.gov/~enrgy_star.html 3 Numbers based of 60% nuclear usage. Nuclear primarily emits radon, releases nuclides and requires long term storage of high level wastes. 4 Numbers based of 60% nuclear usage. Nuclear primarily emits radon, releases nuclides and requires long term storage of high level wastes. 5 University of Pennsylvania Physical Plant.