The Campus Environmental Audit: Air Quality
  • Introduction
  • Air Management at the University of Pennsylvania
  • Relevant Environmental Concepts
  • The Audit
  • The Results
  • Air Management at Other Universities
  • Recommendations and Conclusions
  • Introduction

    The University of Pennsylvania affects air quality from direct and indirect sources. Our laboratories, heating systems, and cooling systems emit a variety of pollutants into the atmosphere. Our utility demand and usage also affects the level of air quality in Philadelphia. Combined these emissions influence the Philadelphia atmosphere and our ability to reach levels of air attainment.

    Back to the top of the page


    Air Management at the University of Pennsylvania

    Air quality at the University of Pennsylvania is monitored on occasion by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety. The office tracks areas relevant to local, state, and federal regulations and ensures a safe working environment. In reference to air quality, Office of Environmental Health and Safety is responsible for assuring compliance with Title V of the Clean Air Act.

    Back to the top of the page


    Relevant Environmental Concepts

    Air is consumed by and effected by all living organisms. Most air pollution comes from human activities such as factories, power plants, commercial and residential sources, and cars, buses, and other transportation sources. Air pollution can also result from natural sources such as forest fires and active volcanoes. Air quality is affected by geographical, meteorological and topographical factors. Stagnating high pressure systems in the summer can cause deteriorated air quality. Urban areas located in valleys can have pollutants trapped over time.

    According to the EPA, emissions of 189 air toxics must be reduced by the turn of the century.(1) These emissions regulated under the Clean Air Act include emissions from area, stationary and mobile sources. There are currently air quality standards for six primary pollutants: carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone and particulate matter with aerodynamic size less than or equal to 10 microns. The effects, sources, and standards governing these pollutants can be seen in table 17. From the periods of 1970 - 90, carbon monoxide has decreased 41%, particulate matter decreased 59%, lead decreased 97%, volatile organic compounds that are precursor's to ozone decreased 31% and nitrogen oxides increased 6%. (2) Areas of non attainment can be seen in Figure 17.

    Ozone depletion, which is known to increase the biologically damaging ultraviolet radiation, continues to fall. Chloroflourocarbons, a primary ozone depletor, fell for the sixth year in 1994, bringing total production down by 77 percent since 1988. This prevents a variety of human health and ecological effects, including non-melanoma skin cancer and decreased productivity of food crops.(3)

    Greenhouse gases, that retain the sun's energy, include carbon dioxide, methane, chloroflourocarbons(CFCs), and nitrous oxide. Carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas, rose by 5.925 billion tons in 1994. In addition, deforestation added an additional 1.1 - 3.6 billion tons to the atmosphere.(4) The Convention on Climate change required industrial nations to formulate policies to manage such emissions by the end of the decade.
     

    Back to the top of the page


    The Audit

    To define the effects of the University of Pennsylvania on our level of air quality, the Green University Audit detailed the following questions: 1. Are federal air-quality standards exceeded in the area? If so, which ones? and how often?

    2. What stationary sources on campus emit toxic air pollutants?

    3. How much air pollution does UPenn generate annually?

    4. What are the most common pollutants?

    5. Has UPenn initiated programs to reduce air pollutants from stationary sources? Describe, and include implementation date.

    6. What kinds of ozone-depleting compounds are used on campus and what are the sources?

    7. Are any programs in place to recapture ozone-depleting compounds or find safer alternatives?
     
     

    Back to the top of the page


    The Results

    In 1994, Philadelphia's air is regulated by the Clean Air Act. The air quality levels was rated good, moderate and unhealthy, 66%, 34% and 1% of the time respectively. The air quality is described by the Pollutant Standard Index(PSI). To calculate the PSI, levels of five pollutants are calculated each day and compared to federal health standards. The five pollutants are chosen from the six criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, PM-10 and SO2. The highest level of any pollutant is used to rate the particular day. Figures 18 and 19 show the trends in good, moderate and unhealthful PSI days. Even though are amount of unhealthful days are decreasing(Figure 19), in comparison to other east coast cities(Figure 20), Philadelphia has had the worst air quality for seven of the last ten years.

    Penn is reporting for the first time in 1996 its stationary sources under Title V of the Clean Air Act. Penn has 51 combustion units, 14 stacks, and 1 incinerator. The combustion units are natural gas and diesel emergency generators for campus buildings, the stacks are ventalation pipes for combustion units, while the incinerator is a permitted crematorium. In addition there are an unknown amount of laboratory fume hoods on campus. The most common pollutants are carbon dioxide and nitrous oxides. Whereas the emissions levels are basically negligible and Penn has no sources that will qualify for under the act as a Òmajor facility,Ó(5) Penn is not expected to be required to file in the future under the act.

    Source: US EPA, Our Mid-Atlantic Environment, EPA-9003-R-95-017, December 1995.

    Penn's primary sources of indirect air pollution are due to energy usage and transportation to campus. Sections 4 and 5 of the first semester Green University Report document respective emissions from these sources. The total effect on air quality is 1041.3 tons of NOx and 275,526.15 tons of CO2.

    In order to reduce ozone depleting compounds, Penn installed a new chiller plant, the MOD-6(see, p. 27 ). The pumping system utilizes a non ozone depleting chemical. Ozone depleting chemicals though are still used in small quantities in laboratories. It is unknown how many freons, halons, and other ozone depleting substances are on campus. The has never been an inventory of ozone depleting chemicals on campus. They are typically in fire protection equipment, air conditioners, and chillers.

    Back to the top of the page


    Air Management at Other Universities

    University of Kansas

    In order to reduce environmental impacts and contain costs, University of Kansas instituted a Freon Recovery Project. In the first six months, the program recaptured one third of the campus' freons, a total of 3,400 pounds. The program also lead to a monetary savings of $15,000.

    The project also led to an overall effort to reduce ozone depleting compounds including chloroflourocarbons in refrigeration systems, carbon tetrachloride in laboratories, halons in fire extinguishers, and chemical sprays used to preserve maps and museum documents. The University investigated alternatives and minimization strategies.(6)

    University Of Waterloo

    University of Waterloo is focusing on reducing air pollution from the campus' stationary sources. They installed carbon dioxide monitors in order to control ventilation use. Furthermore, UW has compressor which captures freon from their cooling system. As a result, high efficiency air removal occurs with minimal loss of freon.

    Back to the top of the page


    Recommendations and Conclusions

    Structural

    1. Environmental Health and Safety and Physical Plant work together in order to maintain information on the quantity and status of air emitting facilities on campus. Therefore communication should be open and information should be accessible between offices.
     
     

    Greening

    Penn does a good job handling our air emissions to comply with relevant regulations and standards. However opportunities to reduce our effect on air quality, lie with efforts to reduce ozone depleting substances.

    1. Freon and other ozone depleting substances from refrigerators, air conditioners and chillers can be reduced by replacing the equipment and evaluations of alternatives when looking to install new equipment. Alternative chiller and refrigeration information and products are available at http://home.navisoft.com/navyozone/altref.htm as part of the U.S. Navy CFC & Halon Clearinghouse.

    EPA also provides information on substitutes for refrigeration and air conditioning systems, fire suppression and explosion protection equipment, foam blowers and solvents via their Significant New Alternatives Program. The initiative which aims to identify alternatives to ozone depleting substances is available at http://www.epa.gov/docs/ozone/title6/snap/

     2. In addition to order to minimize potential effects of ozone depleting chemicals, it is important to:

     1. Repair leaks in air conditioning systems. If leaky air conditioning systems were repaired in automobiles, CFCs releases would be reduced by 30 million pounds annually.(7)

    2. When repairing air conditioners, refrigerants should before servicing. Removing refrigerants from old refrigerators, air conditioners, and dehumidifiers before disposal would prevent releases by 4 million pounds per year.(8)

    3. Halons are bromide containing compounds that are 3 to 16 times more destructive than CFCs. Halons are used in fire protection equipment. Portable extinguishers are typically recharged every 5 - 7 years. At that time non halon systems that use dry chemical agents, foams, or inert gases should be used as alternatives.

    4. Environ$en$e, a pollution prevention resources center, provides information on a wide variety of pollution prevention programs and will allow Penn to benefit from the experience and progress of others. Information is available at: http://es.inel.gov/.
     
     

    Back to the top of the page
    Back to the Penn Environmental Group Homepage


    1US EPA, Guide to Environmental Issues, Document 520/B-94-001, April 1995, p. 9. 2 US EPA, Air Quality Atlas, Document 400-K-92-003, May 1992, p. 2. 3 Lester Brown, State of World, Norton Press, NY, 1992, p. 62 4 Lester Brown, State of World, Norton Press, NY, 1992, p. 62 5 A major facility includes those who emit either (1) 10 tons per year of a specific hazardous pollutant or 25 tons per year of a combination of hazardous air pollutants, (2) 100 tons per year of any other contaminant, or (3) 25 tons per year of VOCs and NOx. Source: Air Management Services, Philadelphia Health Department. 6April Smith, Campus ecology, Living Planet Press, Venice, California, 1990, p. 32. 7EPA, What you can do to stop air pollution, p. 2. 8EPA, What you can do to stop air pollution, p. 2.